| fluterbev ( @ 2009-06-22 13:00:00 |
| Current mood: | |
| Entry tags: | meta |
Meta: The Rules of Fandom (Part 1)
Put the flags out, set off fireworks! I think, after years of flailing in the face of fannish weirdoes weirdness, I'm finally beginning to get the hang of it.
So now, without further ado, I present to you the Rules of Fandom. I have a feeling there may be more posts in this vein to come, hence the fact this one is entitled 'Part 1'.
| What happens... | When you/your friends do it, it is... | When other people do it, it is... |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Post a critique of a piece of fiction: | Perfectly legitimate commentary on something you read. | Bullying and persecution. |
| 2. Make disparaging personal remarks about a writer: | Totally fine. The writer deserves it because |
Bullying and persecution. |
| 3. The writer responds negatively: | Standing up for yourself. You are bravely fighting back against unjust criticism, and exercising your right to free speech. | Pathetic, attention-seeking behaviour. They are whining and should grow a thick skin. Furthermore, it is an attempt to suppress free speech. |
| 4. The writer's friends respond negatively: | Admirable. They are loyal and true and standing up for their friend. | A mass attack. They are a bullying cabal who are banding together to persecute you. |
| 5. Totally unconnected observers respond negatively: | Impartial validation of your position. They are clearly sensible, intelligent individuals who came to a fair conclusion totally on their own. | Dogpiling. They have been brainwashed by propaganda and/or are secretly in cahoots with the bullying cabal. Either way, it’s more persecution. |
ETA: If you'd like the code for this, you can find it here.